She still has her congressional account, and on Monday, the full-time troll and technical House member used that account to daydream about getting her account back and the “full scale meltdown” that would ensue. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s personal Twitter account was permanently suspended in January after she repeatedly spread covid-19 misinformation. As Musk pushed forward with his takeover effort last week he tweeted, “The Barbarians are at the Gate.” But Musk’s techno-libertarian bent, edgelord persona, and frequent condemnations of “wokeness” are bringing fresh hope to the deplorable set that they will see their Twitter access restored. To be clear, there have been no announcements yet that bans are being lifted. That scholar was John Eastman, subsequently the chief legal proponent of Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election.With Elon Musk making a $44 billion purchase of Twitter, which he will own fully as a private company, infamous right wingers who’ve been booted from the platform are eagerly anticipating a return to what Musk is describing as the “digital town square.” The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, the Chapman University professor said, meant only children born to citizens and green-card holders qualified for citizenship by birth. In 2018, meanwhile, Axios quoted one expert who supported Trump’s claims. ![]() The 14th amendment became one of the defining principles of the Republican party.” That’s what the Republican party stood for. The principle was one of opportunity and inclusiveness. “This established a national standard for citizenship. In 2015, the historian Eric Foner told the Washington Post the idea behind the text in the 14th amendment “was that citizenship should be extended to people regardless of accidental characteristics, such as race, national origin or the status of their parents. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Įxperts have also pointed to the irony of a Republican president attacking a foundational achievement of his own party. For more information see our Privacy Policy. Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. Writing in 2018, the Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe said the proposal would have “no chance of surviving review, even by the judges and justices the president has appointed”. Trump claimed the revocation of US birthright citizenship was “in the process” and said: “It’ll happen … with an executive order.”Įxperts predicted then, and predict now, that any attempt to remove birthright citizenship by executive order would face immediate challenge and swift defeat. In fact, more than 30 other countries offer birthright citizenship. ![]() ![]() He added: “We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States. Having campaigned on the issue in 2015 he did not let it drop as president, telling Axios three years later: “It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Trump has repeatedly said he will remove the right regardless. In 1898, in US v Wong Kim Ark, the supreme court settled an outstanding question, ruling that the child of Chinese citizens born in the US was automatically a US citizen. The relevant passage says: “All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Recycling ugly, anti-migrant claims, Trump also said his order would “choke off a major incentive for continued illegal immigration, deter more migrants from coming and encourage many of the aliens Joe Biden has unlawfully let into our country to go”.īirthright citizenship is included in the 14th amendment to the US constitution, which was passed by the Senate in 1866 and ratified two years later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |